同含钢率钢管与配筋钢管混凝土柱的受力性能分析
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

TU398.9

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金资助项目(51968068)


Mechanical Properties of Concrete-Filled and Reinforced Concrete-Filled Steel Tube Columns with the Same Steel Ratio
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

National Natural Science Foundation of China(51968068)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为阐明含钢率对构件的力学特性的影响规律,基于有限元分析方法研究了配筋钢管混凝土(R-CFST)和钢管混凝土(CFST)短柱的轴压性能。首先建立了适合R-CFST的材料本构模型和分析方法并用既有的实验数据验证模型的可靠性,之后进行了36根6种不同含钢率的R-CFST和对应的CFST有限元分析,通过分析荷载-位移响应、承载力、单位面积钢材对构件承载力提高量和延性等指标,最终发现:当混凝土强度较低时,含钢率越低CFST的承载力和延性比同含钢率R-CFST高,但随着混凝土强度的提高,含钢率越大反而使得R-CFST的性能得以显著提高;单位面积R-CFST纵筋对承载力的贡献率都大于单位面积的CFST钢管的贡献率,而且随着混凝土强度的提高R-CFST的这种贡献更为明显;填充高强度混凝土时,R-CFST比CFST更有效。由此得出结论:CFST内配筋比增加钢管壁厚更有效,尤其是填充高强度混凝土时配筋的效果更为明显。

    Abstract:

    In order to clarify effect of steel ratio on the compressive behaviors of Concrete-Filled Steel Tube (CFST) and Reinforced Concrete-Filled Steel Tube (R-CFST) columns, investigations were performed based on the finite element (F.E.) method. Material models and analyses method which are applicable for R-CFST were proposed and the model was validated using known experimental results, and then 36 models of R-CFST and respective CFST with 6 different steel ratios were analyzed. Load-displacement response, load bearing capacity, contribution of steel to the strength on per unit area and ductility were studied. The results show that: the bearing capacity and ductility of CFST are higher than that of R-CFST with the same steel ratio when the concrete strength and steel ratio are lower, the bearing capacity and ductility of R-CFST tend to increase with the increase of concrete strength and steel ratio; strength contribution of longitudinal reinforcement of R-CFST on per unit area is higher than strength contribution of steel tube of CFST on per unit area, and R-CFST’s contribution is more significant as concrete strength increases ; when filled with high-strength concrete, R-CFSTs are more effective than CFSTs. In conclusion, configuring reinforcement in CFST is more effect than increase of the steel tube wall-thickness, especially when filled with high-strength concrete.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

阿里甫江·夏木西,吐迪买买提·巴克,刘晓蕊. 同含钢率钢管与配筋钢管混凝土柱的受力性能分析[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2020, 20(30): 12520-12526.
ALIFUJIANG Xia-mu-xi, TUDIMAIMAITI Ba-ke, LIU Xiao-rui. Mechanical Properties of Concrete-Filled and Reinforced Concrete-Filled Steel Tube Columns with the Same Steel Ratio[J]. Science Technology and Engineering,2020,20(30):12520-12526.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-06
  • 最后修改日期:2020-08-04
  • 录用日期:2020-05-02
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-11-23
  • 出版日期:
×
律回春渐,新元肇启|《科学技术与工程》编辑部恭祝新岁!
亟待确认版面费归属稿件,敬请作者关注